Angelina Jolie: Heroic Mastectomy Role Model or Mastotemanophiliac

29 Jul

By Katherine Smith

Before her Mastectomy
After Mastectomy

Mastotemanophilia – from the Greek mastia [breast], tomein [to cut] and philein [to love] is a paraphilia in which individuals express a strong (sexual) desire for the amputation of a healthy breast or breasts.

Anyone care to guess why Angelina Jolie misrepresented her risk of getting breast cancer?

You can forget about Mike Adam’s (Natural News) conspiracy theory that Angelina Jolie is really a corporate sellout who corrals women into the for-profit cancer industry that claims ownership over the genetic code of all women.

Mike’s Mastectomy Conspiracy is unmitigated mutilation nonsense and his smoking gun is that Jolie’s seemingly spontaneous announcement, “HER BRAVE CHOICE” and “This was the right thing to do,” were part of a well-timed for-profit corporate P.R. campaign that has been planned for months intended to influence a U.S. Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent.

If you can figure out a Supreme Court connection to a celebrity cutting off her boobs let me know.

Angelina told the NY Times she had genetic testing that indicated a high likelihood that she would develop breast cancer.

“My doctors estimated that I had an 87 percent risk of breast cancer and a 50 percent risk of ovarian cancer, although the risk is different in the case of each woman. Only a fraction of breast cancers result from an inherited gene mutation. Those with a defect in BRCA1 have a 65 percent risk of getting it, on average.”

When she is quoted as saying “Only a fraction of breast cancers result from an inherited gene mutation,” she knows that this number doesn’t apply to the entire population: it’s actually old data derived almost exclusively from families that were previously documented to have very high risks of breast cancer to begin with, and even then, it only applied to women who expressed the BRCA1 gene.

A study published on the National Human Genome Research Institute website and conducted by scientists from the National Institutes of Health reveals that breast cancer risks associated with the BRCA1 gene are significantly lower than what’s being hyped up by Angelina and the mainstream media.

In fact, the actual incidence of a woman likely to have the BRCA1 mutation in her genetic code is 1 in 400 to 1 in 800. Let’s use the average of the two and call it 1 in 600.

Therefore, the risk of breast cancer for that 1 woman out of 600 (or, 0.167%) who has the gene mutation, is only 56 %, not the 87% claimed by Jolie. Jolie failed to mention that scientific research shows that 13 % of women without the BRCA1 mutation get breast cancer anyway, so the increased risk is just 43 out of 100 for women who have the BRCA1 mutation.

So what we’re really talking about here is, in that cohort of women having a BRCA1 gene mutation (1 in 600), less than half of them will develop cancer. In other words, only about 1 in 1200 women that have the breast cancer gene will be affected by its expression.

But thanks to people like Angelina and the fear-mongering mainstream media, women all across the nation have been terrified into believing their breasts might kill them and the best way to handle the problem is to cut them off!

Inexplicably when she tells the media that she cut off her boobs because she wanted to live long enough to “meet the first of her grandchildren and to hold them in her arms [and give them the chance to get to know her and experience how loving and gracious she is], she failed to mention that last March she wasn’t worried about lung cancer.

Report: Angelina Jolie Is Chain-Smoking, Drinking, And Bursting Into Tears
By Yellow J on March 17, 2012 | 0 Comments and 0 Reactions

It seems that recent criticism of Angelina Jolie has sent the insecure celeb on crying jags and has her smoking cigarettes and drinking to the point of drunkenness. Apparently producers of her new movie, Maleficent, are concerned that Angelina’s gaunt appearance and new chain-smoking habit do not auger well. A Hollywood source told In Touch Print Edition, March 26, that what set Angelina off was the negative reaction to now infamous leg-thrust pose on Oscar night.

Does she plan to remove her lungs to avoid lung cancer?

Scary stuff, right? The chance of developing breast cancer would send most women to the surgeon, right? Not so fast.

Cutting off your tits because you are worried that sometime in the future you might get breast cancer makes no economic, ethical, or even plain old common medical sense. Not to mention the risks of the implants, allographs and nipple delay surgery.

Will Angelina tell her daughters they should mutilate themselves as a form of medical disease prevention? Angelina’s bizarre logic can also be applied to men. Should they off their testicles to “prevent testicular cancer” or cut out their colons to “prevent colorectal cancer.” Wait I get it. If I have brain cancer the answer will be to chop off my head and call it a cure.

That would be insane because it violates one of the most basic principles of medicine embodied in the Hippocratic Oath, “primum non nocere;” that is, “first, do no harm.” Even a child knows that subjecting patients to the considerable risks of surgery and anesthesia to remove organs that have no disease constitutes “harm.”

[From Mike Adams non-conspiracy article at Natural News, Angelina Jolie inspires women to maim themselves by celebrating medically perverted double mastectomies]

But the really sad part about all this is that Angelina Jolie was lied to. She didn’t have an 87% risk of breast cancer in the first place. All the women reading her NYT op-ed piece are also being lied to. Here’s why…

Cancer doctors lie with statistics and use fear to scare women into high-profit procedures. [No, Mike is wrong, money is NOT the reason she misrepresented her risk of getting breast cancer.]

Even Jolie with her BRCA1 gene that’s linked to breast cancer can quite easily follow a dietary and lifestyle plan that suppresses BRCA1 gene expression. It’s not rocket science. It’s not even difficult. It can be done with simple foods that cost a few dollars a day.

Those foods include raw citrus, resveratrol (red grapes or red wine), raw cruciferous vegetables, omega-3 oils and much more. Those same foods also help prevent heart disease, diabetes, Alzheimer’s and other chronic diseases.

Indole-3-carbinol (I3C), by the way, a natural chemical found in cruciferous vegetables like broccoli and cabbage, offers powerful prevention against BRCA1 gene expression.

How dis-empowering! How sick! How incredibly exploitive of women!

If you really want to be informed about breast cancer and the corrupt, dishonest cancer industry, read Mike Adams (Natural News) article “10 Facts about the Breast Cancer Industry You’re Not Supposed to Know.”

Empowering women with a sense of control over their own health is the last thing the cancer industry wants to do, because that would cause them to lose customers and lose money. [No, Mike is wrong, money is NOT the reason she misrepresented her risk of getting breast cancer.]

When she tells the NY Times “For any woman reading this, I hope it helps you to know you have options,” she utterly fails to offer women any options other than the one she took: check in to a cancer center and let them play “cut-poison-burn” on your body. Jolie’s op-ed piece, which reads as if it were written by the public relations department of the Pink Lotus Breast Center, offers nothing in the way of nutrition advice, lifestyle choices, holistic therapies, wellness, alternative medicine… nothing!

What an incredibly dishonest disservice to all the women of America…

In the world of health, nutrition and cancer, there are thousands of ways to prevent cancer and suppress the expression of BRCA1 genes. Jolie and the cancer industry seem to imply no options exist other than chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery. Three options only.

Angelina Jolie is the new cancer industry cheerleader. Scarred and no doubt experiencing the chest and armpit numbness that almost always accompanies mastectomy surgery, she now seeks to “inspire” other women to exercise their own sick “choice” and have their breasts removed, too!

It is the sickest invocation of women’s power that I’ve ever witnessed. This is not empowering women, it’s marching them into self-mutilation. And the “risk” is a complete fraud.

In truth, Angelina Jolie had a higher risk of dying on the operating table, or from complications of any of her surgeries, than dying from breast cancer if she simply followed an anti-cancer lifestyle.

Mike’s summary:

• BRCA1 genes can be kept quiet (suppressed) through proper foods and lifestyle choices. A gene is not a death sentence.

• The implication that there is only ONE way to reduce breast cancer risk is a complete lie. There are thousands of options and strategies for preventing cancer. Never be cornered into surgery by a group of surgeons pushing irrational fear.

• Cancer micro-tumors exist in everyone. Cancer must be “managed” in everyone to keep it in check and avoid the growth of tumors.

• The cancer industry tricks women using unethical fear tactics to scare women with false statistics into high-profit cancer procedures that only cause them harm.

• The claim that cutting off healthy breasts somehow “empowers” women is sick and demented. Women are far more empowered by honest information on nutrition and healthy living that allows them to keep their bodies intact rather than being sliced up by dishonest cancer surgeons.

[End of excerpt from Mike Adams non-conspiracy article at Natural News, Angelina Jolie inspires women to maim themselves by celebrating medically perverted double mastectomies]

And that bit about the surgery from Angelina’s oped at the NY Times, “But days after surgery you can be back to a normal life,”

“Two weeks later I had the major surgery, where the breast tissue is removed and temporary fillers are put in place. The operation can take eight hours. You wake up with drain tubes and expanders in your breasts. It does feel like a scene out of a science-fiction film. But days after surgery you can be back to a normal life. Nine weeks later, the final surgery is completed with the reconstruction of the breasts with an implant. There have been many advances in this procedure in the last few years, and the results can be beautiful.”

Huh? Even a moron knows there’s nothing sexy about the brutal reality of a double mastectomy. There is no way “you return to your normal life in a few days.” A woman who was diagnosed with Breast Cancer in 6/2012 at the age of 35 and had a double mastectomy in 10/2012 and final reconstruction in 1/2013 was quoted as saying there is nothing normal about having four drains hanging out of your body, not being able to lift your arms to wash your hair or put on a shirt or not being able to sleep comfortably.

I look forward to hearing your ideas/theories of why cut off her breasts instead of getting an expensive scan [which she can obviously afford] every 6 months to see if the cancer has developed. []

Want a laugh?

Look at the two pictures below and notice the hairline, eyes, eye brows, nose, lines on side of mouth and shape of the jaw.

“Dr. Kristi Funk,” on the right is the doctor who posted a detailed description of the Jolie’s mastectomy on the Pink Lotus Breast Center website. On the left is another “doctor” named “Jennifer Ashton.”

“Kristi Funk” is a very odd name so I did a background check on this “doctor” and found she has the EXACT SAME FACE as the “doctor” named “Jennifer Ashton,” who was interviewed by ABC News 2 days ago about Jolie’s allegedly mastectomy.

By going public with her prophylactic double mastectomy, actress Angelina Jolie has again shone the spotlight on breast cancer and the genetic mutation known to increase the risk of getting it by 60 percent. Jennifer Ashton

Jennifer Ashton … Aniston, could she be married to a Brag Pit?


An Anti-Antibiotic Adventure

27 Jul

By Robert Armstrong

I am not a medical doctor and this is not meant to be medical advice.

What are antibiotics?

Antibiotics are medicines that are used to kill bacteria that cause infections (Staph [MRSA and common], E-Coli, etc.) that our own symbiotic bacteria are unable to eradicate. [1]

Antibiotics, it turns out, either have a big ego or just aren’t very smart, because when they kill, they don’t discriminate between the “enemy” bacteria that are causing the infection and the “beneficial” bacteria in your body that are helping your immune system fight the infection.

Darwin’s Theory of Bacteria is that there are weak and strong bacteria that cause infections. Antibiotics only kill the weak bacteria, leaving the strong ones to evolve into what has become known as the Super Bug.

In order to understand what is really going on, we need a short course in antibiotic resistance, a common problem found worldwide.

Antibiotic resistance results from the

  • rampant over-use by the Drug companies because they keep pushing them on unsuspecting patients
  • rampant over-use by the Doctors who keep prescribing these drugs for viral infections they can’t treat; or given to patients who demand them for every illness
  • rampant over-use by the Food industry that keeps injecting them into the livestock we are eating
  • rampant under-use by patients who for whatever reason don’t take the entire course of antibiotics prescribed by their physician

Antibiotic resistance has resulted in what has become known as the Super Bacteria or the “enemy” bacteria; bacteria strong enough to resist the antibiotics the drug companies have developed to fight infections.

A common belief is that, “not taking the entire course of antibiotics prescribed by a physician,” is as or is more serious, than the rampant over-use.

You have probably heard the speech just about every doctor, dentist and veterinarian has memorized word for word, when you ask for/or they give you, antibiotics.

“Take the entire course even if you feel better or else you might not kill all of the “bad bacteria” and bad things will happen.”

According to these experts, when someone does not take the full course of their antibiotic medicine, the bad bacteria left in your body [that the antibiotics failed to kill] become the Super Bacteria. Your infection can last longer and instead of getting better you might get worse and have to make several visits to your doctor’s office.

You might even have to switch medications or go to a hospital to get stronger antibiotics given intravenously.

But the worse part of “your” irresponsible actions (not the irresponsible actions of the Doctors, Drug Companies and the Food Industry) is that you could be exposing your family, friends and anyone you come into contact with to the Super Bug resistant bacteria you are now carrying.

Then, these people might also develop infections that are hard to treat. You are damned if you do and damned if you don’t Catch 22. If you take them when you don’t need them, or don’t take enough of them when the doctor says you need them, then you increase the risk that you, or someone else, will someday get a “Super illness” that is caused by resistant bacteria.

Click here to read An antibiotic primer, Don’t Put Your Antibiotics at Risk By (not for) a dummy published at the Consumer Health Information Corporation and Howard University School of Pharmacy.

This antibiotic medical folklore is unmitigated medical nonsense and would be dismissed out of hand if not for a massive PR campaign exhorting us to take every pill in that bottle OR ELSE we will unleash the Super Bugs in our community (Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staph aureus (CA-MRSA)) [2]

What if your doctor prescribed the wrong dose or the wrong antibiotic? What if the antibiotic started working but then stopped, or never worked at all? When was the last time your doctor considered your body type, weight and history when he told you to take 10 days of one of the most dangerous drugs you can put in your body. Click here to read why Richard Everts at Nelson Hospital believes that for some conditions, stopping an antibiotic regiment early when you feel better is common, logical, effective and has potential benefits on resistance and side effects

Has your Doctor ever told you about probiotics? The absence of probiotic information should be considered medical malpractice. Click here to read If probiotics are essential, why don’t doctors prescribe them?

My Anti-Antibiotic Adventure

My adventure with antibiotics began in May of this year. [3]

On that date I ventured into a foreign “sanitary” environment and caught the MRSA Super Bug.

The location was home to a disabled bedridden 92-year old male suffering from dementia, CHF, and COPD with all of the accessories of a hospital room but no hand washing dispensers for visitors.

Unless you are living under a rock you have noticed those antibacterial cleansers, wipes and hand washing dispensers cropping up everywhere in our community. They encompass an idiotic strategy that we can avoid infections if we keep washing the Super Bugs off our hands before they take up residence in our bodies.

And while I might agree that washing my hands after my visit might have avoided the painful infection I got that day, what about future encounters? A strategy of sanitizing your hands all of the time is doomed to fail because you can’t be 100% effective.

Yes, I am aware that the experts are touting hand hygiene as the way to fight the Super Bugs, but the ‘Clean Your Hands’ campaigns are Hospital based only and are targeted at Doctors and Nurses, who it turns out, are MRSA carriers.

What is a carrier? Carriers have living MRSA bacteria on or inside their bodies. Roughly 30% of people carry Staph bacteria (and a smaller percent carry MRSA) on their skin and/or in their upper respiratory tract (inside their nose) and don’t even know it. They may never get infected and often have no idea they carry it. These people are called “carriers.” [from the Staph Infection Resources Website]

A carrier is a person who has the MRSA bacteria in their system but does not have the infection. The carriers were spreading the infection because they were not washing their hands consistently between every patient.

In fact, without encouragement, hospital workers clean their hands as little as 30% of the time after they interact with patients. The New York Times reported “the problem is so bad that some hospitals are so desperate to contain the costs associated with MRSA infections, they are resorting to electronically tracking the movements of nurses and doctors and reminding them, if they forget, to wash before handling the next patient.” [4]

Even a medical moron understands that sanitizing your hands isn’t eliminating or winning the battle with MRSA. Sanitizing your hands is only keeping a carrier from spreading the infection among the patients in the Hospital environment. The problem in the community is getting worse and cannot be solved by a clean hands strategy. A new government data estimate that about 2,000 people are dying of community-based MRSA every year. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recognizes that MRSA in the community is on the rise and alerts Doctors that “a patient presenting a complaint of “spider bite” should raise suspicion of MRSA, an S. aureus infection.”

MRSA was recently featured in a 60 Minutes segment. “Three years ago the superbug used to strike exclusively hospital and nursing home patients but now a relatively new community-based MRSA is attacking perfectly healthy people who have never set foot in a hospital.”

So while the rates of MRSA in the Hospital setting are falling because the Doctors and Nurses, carriers of MRSA, are forced to wash their hands, the rates in the community are on the rise and no one has an answer.

Even if you believe that you can survive by sanitizing your hands, there is evidence that washing your hands all of the time, may make you more, not less, susceptible to MRSA.

The World’s #1 Natural Health Website,, exposes a number of widely held myths about washing and exposing your hands to gloves and chemicals, especially soaps containing triclosan. It turns out that the compulsive use of antibacterial soaps and other antimicrobial products can be shown to significantly contribute to the growing antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

The rise in community associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections correlates with the presence and the rampant over-use of hand hygiene products and dispensers in the community.

When we use the antimicrobial wipes with toxic chemicals to sanitize our hands we are now destroying the symbiotic biota (good bacteria) that help protect us from infection.

Think about your hands, they are your first line of defense against germs that cause infections. When you sanitize your hands you are doing the very same thing antibiotics do; you are killing the friendly bacteria along with the enemy and in the process compromise your immune system.

In the end you are more vulnerable, not less, to the harmful bacteria lurking in your community looking for a host.

Our fear of getting MRSA is making sure that we will get MRSA.

Back to my Recent MRSA Adventure

Prior to setting foot in the 92-year old’s room, I had never had a common, let alone a MRSA Staph infection. I ignored the growing pus-filled boil on my leg and did not give my body the rest it needed to fight the infection.

I suffered for six days when I was forced to the local urgent care facility. Here is a picture of my right thigh before the wound was painfully lanced, drained and a culture sent to the lab.

When the lancing was over and I stopped hyperventilating due to the pain, I was given the standard antibiotic speech:

“I am putting you on a 10-day course of Bactrim DS, the infection specialists first choice wide spectrum antibiotic known to treat MRSA. Please, I implore you, even if you feel better, don’t stop taking these pills until they are all gone … or you know … you will be putting all of humanity at risk.”

Next I was given detailed instructions about how to care for the wound but nothing about probiotics. I asked the nurse and doctor if I should take probiotics.

The doctor looked puzzled but the nurse was concerned. She suggested I wait until all of the Bactrim was gone before taking probiotics. She didn’t want the Bactrim to work too hard killing off the extra bacteria in my system, huh? Not prescribing pro- with anti- biotics ought to be considered medical malpractice.

And while I have a history of never taking antibiotics or sanitizing my hands, the MRSA was serious enough that I took every Bactrim and subjected my hands to the alcohol based antimicrobial solutions during the next 10 days.

Below is the image of my thigh at the end of the 10 days.

Just as I was starting to feel better, I noticed a welt below my knee on my right leg. Did you know that 30% of us have common Staph or the MRSA bacteria living in our noses? And while I was compulsively washing my hands it turns out that I had scratched the welt the one time I didn’t wash my hands after picking my nose.

Here is an image of the infection after I transferred the bacteria from my nose to my leg.

I then realized I was in BIG trouble. I had just finished 10 days of Bactrim and a week later I have another infection almost as painful and just as debilitating as the MRSA. What can explain why the Bactrim killed the MRSA but failed to eradicate the bacteria in my nose? I called urgent care but they had no answer. I was told to “come in and we can lance the new infection and get you on more antibiotics.”

I was adamant that I will not take any more antibiotics. I needed to find a way to beat this one without taking any more antibiotics.

I rested and took natural supplements to boost my immune system for several days but the infection was getting worse and I was worried it might spread into my knee.

Against the advice of my In-House medical scientist I “gently” squeezed the infected area and pus started oozing out. Unfortunately there was no change in the size of the wound or the pain. We also noticed that icing the wound didn’t help and actually caused my body to develop a rash of itchy welts.

I was ready to accept that the infection needed to be lanced and wanted to know if I could open and drain the wound without taking antibiotics. I contacted my physician neighbor who agreed to see me at his house that night. My neighbor diagnosed the wound as common Staph and sent me home with instructions to use warm compresses and a 10-day prescription of Augmentin 875. I gave in and got the 20 pills of Augmentin. After two days of warm compresses and 4 Augmentin the infection was better but on the third day [2 more pills for a total of 6] the infection was no longer improving.

On the advice of my In-House medical scientist I agreed to another urgent care visit to find out what type infection I had and if it needed to be lanced.

The urgent care physician took one look at the wound and declared that it was MRSA. She took a culture but advised me to discontinue the Augmentin and switch to another 10 days of Bactrim DS. It would be four days before the lab results would be in.

Four days later the infection was almost gone and was healing on its own. Here is the image.

An Antibiotic Multiple Choice Question.

What did I do with the balance of the 20 Augmentin 875 [14] prescribed by Doctor 1 who diagnosed the infection as Staph and/or the 20 Bactrin DS prescribed by Doctor 2 who diagnosed the infection as MRSA but sent the culture to the lab [just to be sure].

  1. Switched to Bactrim and took them for 4 days [Total 6 Augmentin, 8 Bactrim].
  2. Continued the Augmentin [Total 14 Augmentin]
  3. Discontinued all antibiotics [Total 6 Augmentin]

Answer: Discontinued all antibiotics. Why? Two doctors with two different diagnoses convinced me to discontinue the antibiotics. I continued the warm compresses and two days later my infection improved dramatically … without taking any more antibiotics. The lab confirmed the infection was MRSA.

Epilogue: What I think happened.

The 10-day course of Bactrim and the constant hand washing routine put me in a vulnerable position for another infection on my right leg below the knee. Rest and two days of the antibiotic Augmentin, considered ineffective at treating MRSA, were enough to allow my immune system to take over and defeat the second MRSA infection on its own.

Conclusion: Don’t use those hand washing dispensers unless you are going into a Hospital environment and don’t take all of those antibiotics unless you are sure they are helping you. [5]

[1]What is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)?

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is caused by a strain of staph bacteria that’s become resistant to the antibiotics commonly used to treat ordinary staph infections.

This organism is known for causing skin infections in addition to many other types of infections. There are other designations in the scientific literature for these bacteria according to where the bacteria are acquired by patients, such as community-acquired MRSA (also termed CA-MRSA or CMRSA), hospital-acquired or health-care-acquired MRSA (also termed HA-MRSA or HMRSA), or epidemic MRSA (EMRSA). Statistical data suggest that as many as 19,000 people per year have died from MRSA in the U.S.; data supplied by the CDC in 2010 suggest this number has declined by about 28% from 2005 to 2008, in part, because of prevention practices at hospitals and home care.

Although S. aureus has been causing infections (Staph infections) probably as long as the human race has existed, MRSA has a relatively short history. MRSA was first noted in 1961, about two years after the antibiotic methicillin was initially used to treat S. aureus and other infectious bacteria. The resistance to methicillin was due to a penicillin-binding protein coded for by a mobile genetic element termed the methicillin-resistant gene (mecA). In recent years, the gene has continued to evolve so that many MRSA strains are currently resistant to several different antibiotics such as penicillin, oxacillin, and amoxicillin (Amoxil, Dispermox, Trimox). HA-MRSA are often also resistant to tetracycline (Sumycin), erythromycin (E-Mycin, Eryc, Ery-Tab, PCE, Pediazole, Ilosone), and clindamycin (Cleocin). In 2009, research showed that many antibiotic-resistant genes and toxins are bundled and transferred together to other bacteria, which speed the development of toxic and resistant strains of MRSA. S. aureus is sometimes termed a “superbug” because of its ability to be resistant to several antibiotics.

Picture of MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) infection

What does a MRSA infection look like?

In addition, these organisms have been termed “flesh-eating bacteria” because of their occasional rapid spread and destruction of human skin.

Investigators estimate that about one out of every 100 people in the U.S. are colonized with MRSA (have the organisms in or on their body but not causing infection), and these individuals may transmit MRSA bacteria to others by the same methods listed above. Another term for people colonized with MRSA is “carrier” which means the person carries the organism in or on the body and may transfer the organism to another person who subsequently may become infected. A common place for carriers to harbor MRSA organisms is the nose.

Most MRSA infections occur in people who’ve been in hospitals or other health care settings, such as nursing homes and dialysis centers. When it occurs in these settings, it’s known as health care-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA). HA-MRSA infections typically are associated with invasive procedures or devices, such as surgeries, intravenous tubing or artificial joints.

Another type of MRSA infection has occurred in the wider community — among healthy people. This form, community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA), often begins as a painful skin boil. It’s spread by skin-to-skin contact. At-risk populations include groups such as high school wrestlers, child care workers and people who live in crowded conditions.

[2] Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staph aureus (CA-MRSA)

A Superbug that Found Among Athletes, Students, and Military Recruits

From Ingrid Koo, Ph.D., former Guide, Updated January 13, 2009

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA, is a potentially deadly strain of Staph aureus that is resistant to several antibiotics. Previously associated with healthcare exposure, this superbug now also accounts for a growing amount of infections acquired among athletes, students, and the military without necessary healthcare exposure. Such strains of MRSA are known as Community Acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA). Fortunately, its spread can be limited with good hygiene practices.

[3] An adventure is defined as when you are in the middle of the experience you wish you were home watching TV in your favorite chair.

[4] The BMJ study found that the number of patients infected with MRSA fell from 1.88 cases per 10,000 bed days to 0.91 over the four-year period.

Superbug: An electron micrograph of the MRSA bacteria which has killed thousands of people, but is now on the decline in hospitals

There were around 1,000 deaths from MRSA and 4,000 deaths from C.diff each year in the mid-2000s, with the National Audit Office estimating that it cost over £1billion a year to treat people who developed the infection.

Rates for the superbugs MRSA rose significantly in the 1990s from just 100 a year to a peak of 7,700 in 2003 to 2004. Following the launch of the hand-washing campaign rates fell steadily each year to 1,481 cases in 2010 to 2011.

Enlarge MRSA cases started dropping in 2004 after the ‘Clean Your Hands’ campaign was launched

MRSA cases started dropping in 2004 after the ‘Clean Your Hands’ campaign was launched. Click enlarge to see greater detail

The Clean Your Hands campaign reminded visitors and staff to go back to basics by scrubbing their hands before touching patients, eating food and after going to the toilet.

[5] The human body hosts complex microbial communities whose combined membership outnumbers our own cells by at least a factor of ten (1, 2). Together, our ~100 trillion microbial symbionts (the human microbiota) endow us with crucial traits; for example, we rely on them to aid in nutrition, resist pathogens, and educate our immune system (1, 3). To understand the full range of human genetic and metabolic diversity, it is necessary to characterize the factors influencing the diversity and distribution of the human microbiota (4, 5).


The Giffords Event A.K.A Homeland Securities ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

6 Dec

[Copy of Ed Ed Chiarini’s webpage

Ed’s website is often down or locks up my computer.

The Giffords Event
A.K.A Homeland Securities ExPlan Full Scale Exercise (FSE)

NO one was killed
NO one was shot
NO one other than one actor was injured durring the Drill (due to being tackled by one of the other actors and receiving a small cut on the back of his head)

There is NO such person named Loughner
There is NO such person named Judge Roll
There is NO such Person named Christina Taylor Green
There is NO such person named John Green
There is NO such person with the BIRTH NAME of Giffords
There is NO such person with the BIRTH NAME Phyillis Schnect
There is NO such person with the BIRTH NAME Gabe Zimmerman

There is NO person sitting in jail
There is NO lawyer named Judy Clark
There is NO need to waste your time looking past what happened in the parking lot
(unless you are researching who was behind this lie)

There are NO wrongfull death lawsuits filed on anyones behalf
There was NO lien filed on behald of the DA on a person accused of committing this act as required to ofset the Victims Compensation Fund supplied by the state of Arizona

This is Rebecca Joy, which is an AKA because her real name is Jennifer (Greenberg) S exton. Granddaughter of Maurice Greenberg EX CEO of AIG, who really is Dr. Josef Mengele from the Nazi prison camps. He is “The Angel of Death” they all must pay for the damage they have cause this country with their lies. Its time to clean house.After thousands of hours of on-going research, I have shared my findings with other professionals that have been following the same leads. We have found our evidence coincides with each other and tells an entirely different story than the mainstream and AP feed to the American people the day the event took place.

The purpose of the page is not to accuse but to inform the public of some of our findings and inconsistencies in the witness testimonies, friends of Jared Lee Loughner, victim stories, along with a potential relationship link to DHS, and several media groups located in Arizona.

We would like to stress that the alleged evidence and findings we have posted here is not intended to accuse those individuals of criminal activity. It is only to show alleged relationships with some of the victims, friends, and witnesses, law enforcement, and many others that may be involved in the event that took place.

If you see your picture here, we encourage you to come forward. If you would like to dispute any findings or offer additional information in the case, we encourage you to contact us directly so we can hear your story. We are open investigators and we encourage any information that we may consider to adjust our investigation and theory if needed.

We apologize for any pain to family members or people not directly involved in what appears to be result of a false flag. It is not our intent to hurt feelings, cause pain, or accuse individuals. We are only trying to uncover the truth and give the information to the Citizens. We would love nothing more than to debunk our own theory in this case.

If you have additional information that pertains to any of the individuals posted below, or would like to give us additional leads, we would like to speak to you. You can remain completely anonymous. Contact me any time at

Let me begin by stating this section is an ongoing update. It will change whenever new information is uncovered and verified. SO please check back frequently or submit your e-mail address in the box to the left and I will notify you when there are major updates to be reviewed.

To bring everyone up to speed with this event I will begin by asking you to wipe your mind clean from everything you believe to be fact that pertains to the Jan 8th event that took place in the SafeWay parking lot at the corner of the Ina and Oracle intersection.

The following presentation is designed to show without question the events of the 8th day of January 2011 called “Operation Safeway” was a full scale drill, and not the scene of a multiple homicide including the assassination of a judge and the attempted assassination of a us representative.

In order to save time and avoid confusion from all the facts in the case you must break it down into a pass/fail question. Unless you can get past the following question there is no need to spend your time on the evidence that preceded that point. Unless you are proceeding with respect to gain information as to who is behind the scenes and responsible for the event.

The Giffords event can be broken down to one simple question. Was the event that day in the parking lot consistent with a ‘Real World” crime of a multiple homicide? Or was it a planed drill, similar to what is outlined by the Department of Homeland Security internal memo titled the “ExPlan” document (downloadable here)?

When I found the Explan leaked on a buliten board I imediately questioned it authenticity. The document outlined in detail a school shooting exercise scheduled to takeplace in the following week. I was faced with the decision to alert the public as to the planned event and take the chance that the document was a fake, or keep it quiet and wait to see if the event went as they hade outlined it would. Knowing what I know now, I would have traveled to the location and documented the event secretly but I chose to alert the public. I sent it out to over 4000 individuals that I am in contact with that are government watchdogs like myself. Within hours of sending it the Department Of Homeland Security took it upon themselves to call off the event (for reasons they claim due to legitimate threats, something I highly doubt) Nevertheless what they also did is inadvertantly validated the ExPlan document so it now could be used as evidance.

The evidence I will be focusing on will be photographic evidence that is readily available to the public and has been since shortly after the event took place. I am not including testimony of eyewitnesses due to 1. Its not necessary to prove the case, and 2. People lie and there is no way to be sue they are even part of the actual event since there is only a few cases where eye witnesses are even photographed at the seen.

The only other evidence that I would consider relevant but again not necessary to prove the case are the police radio broadcasts that I saved from the archives found at They can be tested for a 60cycl hum and proven authentic if needed to be used in court proceedings.

You must first read the ExPlan. (Download here)

This is critical as you need to understand the roles of the individuals you will see in the photographs. If you do not take the time to familiarize yourself with this document, you will not be able to fully grasp the entire event as it is presented. Not only does it document in detail all aspects of staging this drill, it also sheds light on other aspects of the event that you probably have questions about. One question in particular, is why do several eyewitness give conflicting accounts of the same event? Briefly to answer that question, is because they roll play the scene several times during the day, so that all the participating agencies get the opportunity to have their people run through the scenario and apply what it is they have been trained to do if the scenario were a real world event. This we will go into after the presentation.

Here are some key portions of text taken directly from the ExPlan Document that you need to understand when examining this event. REMEMBER this ExPlan is set for a school shooting but when we look at several ExPlan documents from the past they are assembled by just basically changing the type of event and pertinent pieces to that specific event. Keep this in mind and substitute mass shooting for school shooting and you will see the documents integrity is not changed.

From page 2

This ExPlan gives officials, observers, media personnel, and players from participating organizations information they need to observe or participate in a school shooting/domestic terrorism response exercise that focuses on participants emergency response plans, policies, and procedures as they pertain to school shooting. The information in this document is current at the date of publication, March 21, 2011, and is subject to change as dictated by the Exercise Planning Team.

From page 7
Target Capabilities & Universal Tasks

The National Preparedness Guidelines (The Guidelines) adopt a Capabilities-Based Planning process supported by three planning tools: the National Planning Scenarios, Target Capabilities List (TCL), and the Universal Task List (UTL). The Guidelines have steered the focus of homeland security toward a capabilities-based planning approach which takes an all-hazards approach to planning and preparation that builds capabilities that can be applied to a wide variety of incidents. The Target Capabilities List describes the generalized all-hazards capabilities related to the four emergency management & homeland security mission areas: Prevent, Protect, Respond, and Recover. It defines and provides the basis for assessing preparedness.

From page 12
Terrorism – the unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives. (28Code of Federal Regulations, Section 0.85)

From page 14-15
Exercise Participants (An additional document I suggest is the Actors agreement downloadable here) The term participant encompasses many groups of people, not just those playing in the exercise. Groups of participants involved in the exercise are as follows:

  • Players. Players are agency personnel who have an active role in responding to the simulated emergency and perform their regular roles and responsibilities during the exercise. Players initiate actions that will respond to and mitigate the simulated emergency.
  • Controllers. Controllers set up and operate the exercise site, plan and manage exercise play, and act in the roles of response individuals and agencies that are not playing in the exercise. Controllers direct the pace of exercise play; they routinely include members of the Exercise Planning Team. They provide key data to players and may prompt or initiate certain player actions to ensure exercise continuity.
  • Simulators. Simulators are control staff personnel who role play nonparticipating organizations or individuals. They most often operate out of the SimCell, but they may occasionally have face-to-face contact with players. Simulators function semi-independently under the supervision of SimCell controllers, enacting roles (e.g., media reporters or next of kin) in accordance with instructions provided in the Master Scenario Events List (MSEL). All simulators are ultimately accountable to the Exercise Director and Senior Controller.
  • Evaluators. Evaluators evaluate and provide feedback on a designated functional area of the exercise. They are chosen on the basis of their expertise in the functional area(s) they have been assigned to review during the exercise and their familiarity with local emergency response procedures. Evaluators assess and document participant’s performance against established emergency plans and exercise evaluation criteria, in accordance with Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) standards. They typically are chosen from planning committee members or agencies or organizations that are participating in the exercise.
  • Actors. Actors simulate specific roles during exercise play. They typically are volunteers who have been recruited to play the role of victims or other bystanders.
  • Observers. Observers visit or view selected segments of the exercise. Observers do not play in the exercise, nor do they perform any control or evaluation functions. Observers view the exercise from a designated observation area and must remain within the observation area during the exercise. VIPs are also observers, but they frequently are grouped separately. A dedicated group of exercise controllers will be assigned to manage these groups.
  • Media Personnel. Some media personnel may be present as observers, pending approval by Emergency Management Agency and the Exercise Planning Team. Media interaction also may be simulated by the SimCell to enhance realism and meet related exercise objectives. A dedicated group of exercise controllers will be assigned to manage these groups.
  • Support Staff. The exercise support staff includes individuals who are assigned administrative and logistical support tasks during the exercise (e.g., registration, catering).

From page 18
If a real emergency occurs that affects the entire exercise, the exercise may be suspended or terminated at the discretion of the Exercise Director and Senior Controller. Notification will be made from the SimCell.

Refreshments and Restroom Facilities
Refreshments and potable water will be provided for all exercise participants throughout the exercise. Restroom facilities will be available at each venue.

Exercise Identification
Identification badges will be issued to the exercise staff. All exercise personnel andobservers will be identified by agency uniforms and/or identification badges distributed by the exercise staff. Table 2.1 describes these identification items.


From page 19
Exercise Start, Suspension, and Termination Instructions

The exercise is scheduled to run for 2 hours or until the Exercise Director determines that exercise objectives have been met. From the SimCell, the Exercise Director will announce the start of the exercise and exercise suspension or termination through the controller communications network. ALL SPOKEN & WRITTEN EXERCISE COMMUNICATIONS WILL BEGIN & END WITH THE STATEMENT THIS IS AN EXERCISE

Player Communications
Players will use routine, in-place agency communication systems. Additional communication assets may be made available as the exercise progresses. The need to maintain capability for a real-world response may preclude the use of certain communication channels or systems that usually would be available for an actual emergency. In no instance will exercise communications interfere with realworld emergency communications. Each venue will coordinate its own internal communication networks and channels.

The primary means of communication among the SimCell, controllers, and venues will be the Pottawattamie County 800MHz radio system. A list of key telephone and fax numbers and radio call signs will be available in a Communications Directory before the exercise starts. In addition, the communications plan is attached at Appendix D.

From page 20
Public Affairs

This exercise enables players to demonstrate increased readiness to deal with a school shooting. Any public safety exercise may be a newsworthy event. Special attention must be given to the needs of media representatives, allowing them to get as complete and accurate a story as possible; however, their activities must not compromise exercise realism, safety, or objectives. Only designated agencies will be responsible for disseminating public information before Operation Closed Campus. The Emergency Management Agency will coordinate this function.

From page 22
During the Exercise

· Respond to exercise events and information as if the emergency were real, unless otherwise directed by an exercise controller.

· Controllers will give you only information they are specifically directed to disseminate. You
are expected to obtain other necessary information through existing emergency information

· Do not engage in personal conversations with controllers, evaluators, observers, or media personnel. If you are asked an exercise-related question, give a short, concise answer. If you are busy and cannot immediately respond, indicate that, but report back with an answer as soon as possible.

· If you do not understand the scope of the exercise, or if you are uncertain about an organization’s or agency’s participation in an exercise, ask a controller.

· Parts of the scenario may seem implausible. Recognize that the exercise has objectives to satisfy and may require incorporation of unrealistic aspects. Every effort has been made by the exercise’s trusted agents to balance realism with safety and to create an effective learning and evaluation environment.

· All exercise communications will begin and end with the statement This is an exercise. This precaution is taken so that anyone who overhears the conversation will not mistake exercise play for a real-world emergency.

· When you communicate with the SimCell, identify the organization, agency, office, or individual with whom you wish to speak.

· Speak when you take an action. This procedure will ensure that evaluators are aware of critical actions as they occur.

· Maintain a log of your activities. Many times, this log may include documentation of, activities that were missed by a controller or evaluator.

After the Exercise

· Participate in the Hot Wash at your facility with controllers and evaluators.

· Complete the Participant Feedback Form. This form allows you to comment candidly on emergency response activities and exercise effectiveness. Provide the completed form to a controller or evaluator.

· Provide any notes or materials generated from the exercise to your controller or evaluator for review and inclusion in the AAR.


Qualified personnel who have legal authority to carry weapons (e.g., law enforcement, security, military) and who have an assigned exercise role (e.g., responder, tactical team) with the potential for interaction with other exercise participants (e.g., actor victims) will NOT carry a loaded weapon within the confines of the exercise play area. They may continue to carry their weapon only after it has been properly cleared and rendered safe (i.e., no ammunition in chamber, cylinder, breach, or magazines) and only after being marked or identified in a conspicuous manner (e.g., bright tape visible around the stock or holster).

Photo 1 “ExPlan Controller”

This image was released by the AP.

It shows a scene out front of the SafeWay, at or around the area said to have been where Rep Giffords was standing.

Items of interest:
All the individuals are wearing the appropriate gloves as you would expect Emergency responders would. All but one individual who is holding cards in his hands.

Notice no blood on anyone or what would be consistent with a point blank 9mm hollow point rounds damage to a human.

The EMT personnel carrying yellow 900MHz communicators clipped on various points of clothing some on their pockets others on their belts.

A small cup of what appears to contain something red. Assembly the red liquid used on some of the actors to make the event more realistic. (this is discussed in the Actors Agreement in the section that warns them to wear old clothes because they may get cut by the EMT workers and or ruined by the fake blood used during the drill)

In this photo we see emergency personnel with gloves tending to an individual that is playing the role of a victim. This due to no signs of injury that we would expect from a shooting of this type. The individual without the gloves, is reading from cards he has in his hands. We can see there are more than one card due to he is reading from one hand while in his other hand more cards are visible. According to the ExPlan Document this person is identified as a Controller/Evaluator.

Controllers are exercise participants who plan and manage the exercise play, setup and operate exercise venues, and act in the roles of response individuals and agencies not actually playing in the exercise. Controllers provide key data to players and may prompt or initiate certain player actions to ensure exercise continuity. Controllers are the only participants who will provide information or direction to the players.

The Yellow communication radios they players are wearing are specified in the ExPlan as the 900MHz cell communications that the controllers and other officials can communicate directions to their particular group. Communicating in this fashion enables the chatter pertaining to the event to be on a controlled loop and keeps unnecessary chatter from interfering with the REAL WORLD communication they are still responsible to react to if an event should arise during their drill that they need to go take care of.

Since they are clipping them on various parts of their body shown they are not standard equipment they typically carry, and in one video we even see one of the individual drop the radio on the ground as he is making his way to the helicopter.

The Controller in this photo would be providing the EMT workers with necessary information so they can perform whatever task they have been trained to do. For example, something a controller might say during an event may be similar to the following statement: “This is Mary a 40 year old female that suddenly collapsed. before she fell witnesses overheard her make a comment that her head was throbbing shortly after, within minutes she collapsed” From that statement the EMT would then kick into high gear and perform as they would if this were a real event. Taking note of the Actors Agreement document we see the comment warning the actors to wear old clothes and understand they may be cut by EMT workers as they perform they duties. They are also made aware they may be transported to the emergency room just as if they were actually injured. Individuals that are tasked as the criminal for the event will be handcuffed and transported to the station just as if they actually committed the crime they are acting out. Transportation from the hospital or police station is also provided to them after the event is complete.

That photo in itself should be enough to prove the event that day was a drill. But I understand there are skeptic that need further persuasion so we will move on to the next image.

This photo that has been titled “Heroic Acts in Tucson” shows the heroic efforts of Daniel Hernandez, who is said to be one of Rep Giffords aids.

For the full size version click here

This photo depicts the emergency workers while transporting an individual we are told by Daniel is that of Rep Giffords. In Daniels testimony on many occasions he states. This is from the Azcentral interview by Jaimee Rose and Mary Jo Pitzl – Jan. 9, 2011 12:01 AM

Read more:

When the shots began that morning, he saw many people lying on the ground, including a young girl. Some were bleeding. Hernandez said he moved from person to person checking pulses.

“First the neck, then the wrist,” he said. One man was already dead. Then he saw Giffords. She had fallen and was lying contorted on the sidewalk. She was bleeding.

Using his hand, Hernandez applied pressure to the entry wound on her forehead. He pulled her into his lap, holding her upright against him so she wouldn’t choke on her own blood. Giffords was conscious, but quiet.

Ron Barber, Giffords’ district director, was next to her. Hernandez told a bystander how to apply pressure to one of Barber’s wounds.

Barber told Hernandez, “Make sure you stay with Gabby. Make sure you help Gabby.”

Hernandez used his hand to apply pressure until someone from inside Safeway brought him clean smocks from the meat department. He used them to apply pressure on the entrance wound, unaware there was an exit wound. He never let go of her.

He stayed with Giffords until paramedics arrived. They strapped her to a board and loaded her into an ambulance. Hernandez climbed in with her. On the ride to the hospital, he held her hand. She squeezed his back.

When they arrived at the hospital, Hernandez was soaked in blood. His family brought him clean clothes because the FBI took his for evidence.

Read more:

This statement was made to many news agencies which show they are not misquoting his recount of the event.

Unfortunately when we view the photo of Daniel and the person said to be Giffords who is like he states strapped to a board and put on a stretcher, we find one LARGE discrepancy that makes not only his story a lie but again is consistent with that of a drill. That being for a person who used his bare hands to apply pressure on a persons through shot head wound, and to do so after they pulled that person up on their lap so “they wouldn’t choke on the blood” the fact that not even a drop of blood is visible on his hands, clothing, the EMT workers, their gloves, Daniels pants ANYWHERE except a few little traces on the injured persons face and the towel sitting on their head. NOTHING even close to what would be expected if this event were a real world shooting.

This is not even addressing the many other technical issues like the EMT worker holding the IV at the wrong elevation, or the Oxygen tank strapped in between the victims legs, and the fact there is not even a effort to cover the person and their undergarments (this of course being a US Representative no doubt) These additional items can be discussed and debated but the underlying facts that this photo shows people taking part in a DRILL is the main focus of this presentation. All other additional information is moot at this point.

These two photographs should be sufficient in proving the official version of events not accurate and what actually occurred was a Drill. BUT… I know there will be some who still cant believe they were lied to by our officials, so we will continue with the next piece of photographic evidence.

Lets call this one “couple grieving” since I have been unable to find any official name for the photograph. This image shows an older male and female couple. The male with his arm around the female in a condoling manner.

We see the two carrying water bottles consistent with water bottles we see other actors carrying during this event. Refreshments as stated in the ExPlan document are provided and we can assume these water bottles are part of the refreshments. That fact is merely a side note as we see these individuals are clearly within the police DO NOT CROSS tape, meaning they are within the crime scene perimeter This means they are officials, or part of the emergency, as witnesses, or persons being questioned immediately after the event, even though this would more than likely take place outside the crime scene tape. This is key because we are told the Assassination of a Federal Judge and the attempted Assassination of a US Rep along with multiple others we said to have been killed within that crime scene. The preservation of a crime scene is key and with individual of such importance being part of the event there would be no detail overlooked or scrutinized. For witnesses to be walking within the crime scene perimeter unescorted would be unheard of, and grounds for any first year defense attorney to scream mistrial. In addition to these people walking carelessly within the crime scene we see in the background a person holding two forms of communications (again consistent with the the communications guidelines outlined in the ExPlan) she is also wearing a lanyard around her neck with a badge constant with that of an ExPlan colored identification badge. I go into this in detail in a later section.

As if this weren’t enough, its nothing in comparison to this next outrageous acts. Examining closely the individual within this photograph we can see they are identified as none other than two of Sheriff Dupnik’s Aux Volunteers. There is no disputing their identity in the Annual Awards booklet produced and downloadable from the Sheriff’s own web site.

This shows without any doubt they are officials playing the roles of actors in this event. Without connecting them to the Awards booklet they would have remained just another by-standard.

Again, I understand this is all so hard for some to deal with. It is something I wish were not true but unfortunately it is and is backed up by irrefutable evidence. But just in case there remains a few skeptics, we will continue.



Where in the world is your wife Mary, Tom?This photo along with several others show an individual who we can identify as being Tom McMahon.

Tom, husband of Mary Reed, who you might remember as being shot three times in the back and arms, as she spread eagle to protect her daughter Emma McMahon from being shot. She was also one of Representative Giffords’ summer pages. The same Emma who ran inside the SafeWay after the shooting, and called 911 but neglected to tell the 911 operator that her own mother laid on the ground shot 3 times. In addition she also forgets to find her father who in his own statement claims to have been only 10-15 feet away. The same Emma who then tells the operator she will be hiding in the back of the store where its safe, but then during her interview with CNN she recalls calling from inside the WALGREENS but then proceeds to say the butchers from the meat department aided with the injured. WALGREENS does not have a meat department.

If that story wasn’t enough to seal the deal. Lets look at the next photograph. The tall person clearly visible in the photo is Tom McMahon. He along with many other civilians, stands inside the crime scene area as they enjoy their refreshing beverages provided by the event planners. Ask your self if your wife had just been shot three times and was rushed away to the emergency room don’t you think you would be right along side of her? Of course you would, but here we see Tom without a care in the world. That’s because the actor playing Mary was taken to the hospital as stated in the “Actors Agreement” and would be transported to the ER just as if it were a real world event. Leaving the other actors at the scene to continue playing their part until told the event was finished.

By now there should be no question that the event that day was a controlled drill. When you understand this fact you can stop debating weather or not Loughner did this or did that, because it does not matter. The event stops when it is understood that it was a drill and no one was killed that day. Everything from that point is designed to keep you searching and distracted from the truth.

In addition to the photographic evidence, the other credible piece of evidence that can also be verify are the Police broadcast.

Listening to the broadcasts, we can hear several emergency calls go out over a period of several hours. This again was for a mass shooting that was under control, as per the sheriffs own press release, just minutes after the first responders arrived. But even though we have full statements from the Pima county Sheriff the same call for a mass shooting go out again almost two hours after the first two (the first we don’t have a recording of since that Pima radio channel was under their total control. But we do have the Oro Valley broadcasts that confirm this. Listen for yourself.
If you found this presentation helpful, please consider donating to help us to continue our efforts.


At this point, you know it was a drill.

Any information after this point is moot, and useless. Unless you are attempting to trace down the parties responsible for the propaganda.

Remember this and do not forget these things, as most people tend to fall back into the thinking that the information is factual, but IF THE EVENT WAS A DRILL THEN NONE OF THE OTHER STORIES ABOUT LOUGHNER IN HIS SCHOOL ACTING OUT ARE TRUE.

  • No one was killed that day at that location.
  • No one was shot in that parking lot.
  • No child died that day due to being shot by a gunman in that parking lot.
  • No Judge was Assassinated, and more than likely no judge was there due to that would have been not allowed for a Federal Judge to meet outside of business hours with elected officials of a political party.
  • And MOST OF ALL Loughner does not exist. NONE of the individuals that claim to have been shot by him at telling the truth and we know that the Phyllis Schneck character was played by Brandan Lee Pittmans own Mother.

The only person injured that day was Bill Badger. While being tackled by Joe Zamudio he hit his head. That is the only photos of real blood that spilled in that parking lot that day.

So the following information is meaningless due to we have already established the event was a drill.

It is the archive of the initial investigation which you are welcome to review if you so choose to spend your time discussing imaginary characters and how many bullets they would have fired in their imaginary Glock.

Briefly after the events that took place in Tucson on Jan 8th, I began looking into what I believed was the media lying once again to the public about events, that would be used as fuel, to push, the anti gun, and free speech movement.

My initial intent was to find out if indeed what I saw on TV was not just the creation of some Hollywood, made for TV production. But what I found shock me to the core of my being. It’s difficult to understand fully the immensity of the information I present, but nevertheless, I feel it’s my obligation to present it, so that you can make up you own conclusions. Good, bad, right, or wrong, understand I have no political, financial, personnel, or corporate agenda funding my actions. I stand to gain only more stress for releasing this info, but if the outcome rids this country of individuals that exist only to cause harm to others then it will have been worth it.

You can learn more about my experience and background by visiting my bio section.

The Investigation
As I mentioned the information I have uncovered is not easy to swallow. I still have hope that I am wrong, but as the days go by the evidence

increases as my hope that this is all one big misunderstand decrease to the point of almost nonexistence.

It’s my belief that if any progress is to be made, it will not be because I have managed to match a few more actors to their real identities. That doesn’t mean that it was a waist of time by any means, it just means that I am choosing to focus my efforts on what I consider to be a key overlooked hurtle that once overcome, the rest of my work will have a proper place to be presented.

My official statement as to the Rep Giffords event in Arizona, on Jan 8th 2011 is as follow:

A foundation, based on irrefutable factual evidence must be established in order to eliminate the ability for the dis info agents to keep everyone distracted, and fighting internally with each other. This foundation is composed of a few basic questions that if the event we witnessed that day were accurately reported by the media, should prove simple to answer.

These questions are as follows:

Was they’re a shooting at that location, on Jan 8th 2011, that involved the persons Representative Giffords, and The Honorable Judge John Roll?
Was the event in the SafeWay parking lot, and surrounding area, a staged training event similar to what is outlined in the ExPlan document, and subsequently no one was struck with a bullet at that location?

safeway parking lotTo the best of my ability, I believe the only data that can be tested for accuracy and verified by proven scientific forensic analysis as to its authenticity, is the Police, and Fire, radio dispatch “calls” broadcast that day, by the Oro Valley police, and fire, dispatch center.

That evidence, allows me to make the reasonable claim that the event that day was a drill. My statement is based on the fact that approximately 10:45am, Jan 8th, 2011, Oro Valley Police departments primary dispatch channel broadcast a call, concerning a “Mass Shooting” with multiple injured at the SafeWay parking lot, adjacent to the Ina and Oracle intersection in Tucson Arizona. Included in her call was the

information that directed those to the location that a command center was already set up in the parking lot, and from what direction to enter the shopping center.

That same day, the same Oro Valley Police Dispatcher that made the 10:45 call, made a second call for another “Mass Shooting” at approximately 12:06pm to the same SafeWay Parking lot adjacent to the roads Ina and Oracle, and provides the identical information about the command center and how to enter the complex.

Now remember the Shooting took place at 10:00am according to the Pima Sheriffs office press release first officers arrived at 10:15 and had the suspect in custody just a few minutes after arriving. The reason why we don’t hear this call go out is due to the event calls for control of a radio channel for them to communicate on. This is confirmed by the Oro Valley dispatchers who make the comments that the other channel had so much traffic they couldn’t get through to individuals they needed to speak to. The Oro Valley dispatch combined with the press releases released by Sheriff Dupniks office provides a full picture of the events that happened that day.

Those are the irrefutable facts of the matter. Upon listing to the archived recording you can clearly hear the difference in the tones of the operators voice that during the first dispatch came from a person that obviously thought the event was real. The second time around her voice is drastically different, and almost completely monotone. We could speculate why but what is not speculation is the simple fact that the event was played out at least twice that day once at 10:36am and again at 12:06pm.

Those are the facts as I know them and I would be willing to testify as to this statement under oath in court.

If anyone has one of these badges that they can photocopy, or better yet, wold like to sell, I would be happy to discuss it with you or you can remain completely annon. I’m just trying to get the truth to the people.

For researchers
Use this as a guide to understand how FSE’s (Full Scale Events) are conducted.

It outlines a school shooting scenario but the blueprint almost identical to the Giffords event as well as others.
ExPlan, Participant-Handout, Actor-Info-Waiver-Form
Police Dispatch at 5:00pm for 2nd shooter who matches physical description of Jared Loughner
10:35am calling out event and command center location
10:45am calling out the witnesses found gun outside 2nd safeway
12:03pm calling out event and command center location
Shooting_Injured, Shooting_Update

So who were the actors that were involved?

Let me start with this clip. It aired on the 6th ~~~ 2 days BEFORE the Giffords event.

When you watch this please take note of this clearly expresses someone had fore knowledge that the Giffords event was about to take place.

Grey’s Anatomy Season 7, Episode 11 – Air Date: 1/6/2011

Disarm” News of the incoming mass causalities after a gunman opens fire at a local college hits the staff hard when they must spring into action, even while their own wounds a… User Rating: Full StarFull StarFull StarFull StarHalf Star TVF Review: Full StarFull StarFull StarFull StarHalf Star

After the event took place, I felt like most of America, that we were not being told the truth. So I managed to contact Steven Cates (the guy with the pink hair) through Face book. We chatted a few times but he never would admit to being an actor in this event, so I kept digging. After a few days of searching google for his name I ran across a web site that listed Steven as well as 3 other individuals as part of a media group called Radian-Helix media. Once I found their Face book site then each of the individuals listed as being a contributor to the company, the pieces started to fall in place. One by one the people we were being shown on the TV as being an eye witness, Dr., Giffords staffer, event attendee, first responder, etc were looking like friends of one of the Radian Helix Media partners, Dave Weiss

As you look at the evidence keep Mr. Weiss in mind, and take a look at his FB page for your self. Is this all just a massive coincidence?

Dave Weiss Facebook link
Radian-Helix Media link
Radian-Helix Media Corporate filings

The individuals pictured below can be found in the following 3 Pima county documents. Download them and judge for yourself.

Click to download Click to download Click to download

The Real Dr. LeMole Found.
DAVE WEISS has posted old photos of himself on his site in an attempt to through you off the path. Nice try there Dave. The mystery that surrounds him does not effect the fact that he is connected to all the individuals we talk about on this site.Dave Weiss aka Dr.. LeMole (Rep Giffords Arizona Dr.) isn’t a Doctor at all, he just plays one on your TV. Dave is a partner in a film, video, and CGI media production company located in Arizona called Radian Helix media. Its owned by Brandan Pittman (the person you see when you look at the Jared Lee Loughner mug shot) In Daves Face Book friends list we find people that look alike and share the same genetic facial landmarks as do individuals either living or dead on the news. Here are just a few of the people you can find there:

Dan Adragna or Holly Bobo’s Father
Amanda Barns Hicks or Holly bobo (missing Tennessee Girl)
David Hicks or Gabe Zimmerman (Giffords Aid that was killed)
Joshua Frederici or Bradley Manning (wikileaks leaker)
Emily Kuntz or Emma McMahon (Giffords Shooting eye witness)
Bonnie-Jean Brown or Mary Reed (Emma’s McMahon Mother)
Ronald Globe or Dr Steven Rayle (Giffords Shooting Eye witness)
Anthony Nguyen or Dr. Peter Rhee (Giffords Arizona Dr)
Michael Burkeen or Dr. Imoigele Aisku (Giffords Houston Dr)
Daisy Axford or Kelly O’Brien (Gabe Zimmermans Fiance)
Kristi Lanier or Desta Hughes Stutts (Current Speech Therapist for Giffords)
Hope Nixon or Kenia Monge (Missing Colorado Teen)
April DeWilde Warmington or Holly Bobo friend
Samantha Archer or sister of Carrie Thomas Murdered at Moreno Valley ATM
Anchyi Lena Urena or missing girl Yee Wah Ho
Jason Bast or Fort Hood Shooter
David Isaacs or Giffords Memorial guitar player (to come)
Gabe Hernandez or John Inzuna
Pam Simon or Nancy Koop Medley
Dave Weiss or Dr Lemole
Debbie Francis-Lane or Sara Hummel Rajca (Giffords Staff)
David Waterso or fox news Jonathan Hunt
Fritz Simon or James Eidlhuber
Ben Lofton Loughner family friend

Please note individuals may look slightly different than their personal photos. Keep in mind we are talking about Hollywood. These people are actors and have makeup hair and lighting to help out covering or changing their appearance. Also Some people have gained or lost weight since one or the other photo was taken. I don’t know when their FB photos were shot but this down not change facial landmarks as they are genetically positions and are not changeable like soft tissue is.

Another note – Just because you can pull a web page up wit a Dr. and their bio on it does not mean that person actually exists. I will report my findings shortly that address the misconception about fake pages, and how to take your investigation one step further past their laziness to uncover if the person really is who they say or exists at all.


As I get time I will be including the Archived Face Book pages of each of the individuals so you can see the connection in their friends list to Dave Weiss or someone that knows Weiss.


Hello world!

6 Dec

Welcome to! This is your very first post. Click the Edit link to modify or delete it, or start a new post. If you like, use this post to tell readers why you started this blog and what you plan to do with it.

Happy blogging!